Welcome to DigitalDin.com - thanks for visiting! close ×
+

Second Story – ‘Abducted’

So, once I was able to start mixing with the REAL drum tracks, the first song I started working on was the first one in the queue (they’re alphabetical). So, Abducted it is!

Abducted was one of Second Story’s simpler songs; a basic A-B-A-B sort of affair, it has some very cool unique things going on. For one, John’s repeating hypnotic keyboard bass line in the choruses are hooky as hell. Also, I played the verses using the Funk Fingers (see an earlier blog post if you don’t know what those are.) Tom played the hell out of the verse groove, particularly. And Scott had a nice recurring melodic line. Also curious is the lack of any vocals in the “chorus” – the intent (with John’s bass line and Tom playing “four on the floor”) was to simulate a dance floor. After all, the song is about being Abducted by the groove. So the groove says it all in this one.

So I did a bit of work on the tune, and Scott came over and listened to my early “alpha mix.” He had a couple of interesting suggestions, and we did a little bit of fun experimentation, particularly on some vocal effects. There are also some interesting “surprises” that will reveal themselves when the song is finally released – but I’m not giving out any spoilers, so you’ll just have to wait.

(evil grin.)

Share : facebooktwittergoogle plus
pinterest

The Second Story Project

So, I have to say that it’s interesting to resurrect a project that once was – for all intents and purposes – dead. Here’s the back story:

My previous project, Second Story®, was a female fronted neo-prog group that played in the Philly region from 1996-2004. We recorded our original, self-titled album at Eyeball Studios early on; it comprised mostly material that Scott and I had written before John or Danielle had joined the band. (In fact, 5 of the songs had been previously recorded with our original singer, Zaughn.)

We gigged a bunch behind that album, all the while writing new material. We began recording our second full-length album – to be called “Thin Twisting Line,” from a song lyric on it – in January 2001. To steal a phrase: What a long, strange trip it was to become.

We booked an entire week at Indre Studios in Philly, a large-scale, well-known (and expensive) studio in the area. All of us took a week off from work to allow us to all be there the whole time. Based on our familiarity with the material, our previous studio experiences, and the expected professionalism of the studio, we figured we’d probably have time left over at the end.

Boy, were we naive.

The first of many things that went wrong? Less than a week before the starting date, the studio manager called: “Patti LaBelle wants to come in to do rehearsals the week you’re booked. Can you bump?” So, I called the rest of the band, and we were able to accommodate her. For a price, of course – the liner notes of the album, if we complete it, will contain the line “Thanks to Patti LaBelle for providing the tape reels for our recording session.” Yeah, we don’t move for anybody for free – not even Patti LaBelle. And three brand new 2″ tape reels cost well over $600.

So, as you can imagine by my tone, we didn’t finish the project in the 7 days we allotted. We didn’t even get half of the tracking done, never mind mixing. AND, to make matters worse, John and myself, who both worked for an music software firm at the time, came back to the next work week to find out that we both were getting laid off. So, in the middle of this fabulously expensive studio foray, John and I lost all of our expendable income (and our living income, too!)

To make a very long story a little shorter, we were able to manage sporadic trips back to the studio over the next several months, but it took a couple of long, agonizing years to actually complete the tracking. Then we moved to mixing. That ended up being even more disappointing; after the vast amount of time that had passed – after the great deal of time, energy, and money that had been spent – the mixing of the album went quite badly. The resulting album sounded disjunct, loose, and just weak. We left the studio completely spent and totally demoralized.

After some time passed, we decided to take those tapes to a new studio to re-mix with a new engineer and fresh ears. After some aggravation getting the tapes transferred to a format that worked, we let Vic at Giant Steps have a go at it. His mixes were considerably better, but they still didn’t capture what we had hoped for, and we knew we couldn’t release the CD and be proud of it.

Not long after that disappointment, the band quit being active in performance or songwriting, and the album has been essentially shelved since our “disbandment” in 2004. But we’ve always wanted to complete the album, if only to have something to show for all the time and money.

So over the last year, I’ve been collecting the things I need – and the time and experience – to do the mixes myself. The original studio tapes were in multiple formats; the drums were recorded on 2-inch 24-track reel-to-reel, while the rest of the tracks were sync’d on a trio of 8-track digital tape machines (DA-x8 machines by Tascam).

I picked up a DA-38 for a few hundred bux on eBay; however, a 2″ 24-track machine is about the size of a large refrigerator, and about twice the weight. And, they usually run for between $10-20k. So, unless one fell from the sky, I couldn’t reasonably obtain one of those, especially not for a one-off project. And a lot of studios don’t have them anymore, since the advent of ProTools and other DAW systems.

So, considering that I’d have a hard time converting the 2″, I was planning on doing the mixing based on the tracks on the digital tapes only – the recording engineer had put rough drum mixes (kick/snare/kit L/kit R) on the tapes to save wear and tear on the 2″ machine. Unfortunately, I quickly found that it wouldn’t be a good solution – the 4-track drums on the digital tapes were totally inadequate.

Luckily, I found a guy who runs a studio in Millville, and he has a 2″ machine. He dumped the tracks down to individual tracks on a DVD for me, so now I’ve got everything! I’ve dumped all the 8-track digital stuff down to SONAR, and now with the addition of the original 2″ drum tracks, I can really get at these mixes.

Okay, so it begs the question: “Why will it be different?” I mean, we had two professional engineers at two different studios attempt (and fail) to mix our album.

Here’s why:

  1. I’m not on a timetable due to budget constraints – I can take my time
  2. I fully understand the “vision” – meaning, I KNOW what it’s supposed to sound like
  3. I really want it to sound good this time. It means a lot to me (and my bandmates)

Well, that was a record-breaking blog post for me. I’ll start telling you how the mixing is coming along in my next one… Hint: so far so good!

😉

Share : facebooktwittergoogle plus
pinterest


The Rig from Hell, Part II: The ADA Preamplifier, and why it’s so freaking awesome…

One of the key components in my “rig from hell” is the ADA MB1 preamplifier. It’s well over 10 years old, and the company that made it no longer exists (as I understand it, their factory burned to the ground and they just cut their losses and closed up shop rather than rebuild) – but I love what it does for me; I even own a backup that lives in my studio rack.

It’s an electronically controlled unit that allows you to create 256 recall-able preset tones (it also comes with some of its own factory presets). Lots of EQ control is a given, with multi-band and parametrics galore; but one of its nicest features is that it’s actually a “dual” preamp – your signal passes through (at your option) 1 or 2 onboard circuits: a solid-state preamp as well as a tube-based preamp. So you can combine those two characters to create a very unique blend. And the tube preamp also has overdrive, so that adds to the sonic stew.

Also quite useful (essential, in my case): dual effects loops, which are switchable within your presets. It also has a built-in chorus effect and built-in compressor, both useful tools for bassists.

It also features Bi-Ampable outputs (alongside a standard full-range output) which I used when running the full rig with both cabinets. When I’d play smaller rooms, I’d bring just the 2×10 and run full-range through that.

The ultimate key, though, was that the preamp is MIDI-controllable. That means that I could use a MIDI floor pedal to choose between presets on the MB1, either between songs or mid-song, to change the sound that I was playing. ADA even made a simple pedal that worked well, but my Ground Control pedal was much more advanced (read about that in a future post.) So whether I needed a straight-ahead bass sound, a distorted grinding tone, a chorus-laden tubey sound, or one of many others, I had to but step on my pedal. And different presets used various effects, too – some used the effects loops, some bypassed them. So already I have lots of tonal flexibility, and I haven’t even delved into the many other pieces of gear in the rack.

Next issue: Various Bass Effects Units in the Rig From Hell

Share : facebooktwittergoogle plus
pinterest


The Rig from Hell (Part I)

I’ve made several mentions of my “insane bass rig” and I guess it’s probably time to clarify that description. Lots of bassists have put together bass rigs that are excessively complex and chock full of features and tones (most of which they’ll never use.) There are also plenty of bass toys out there that do some amazing things; the Line6 gear offers tons of tonal flexibility by modeling a huge collection of amps and effects, the Roland V-Bass does it as well (but uses a special pickup to accomplish it). There are certainly plenty of analog effects pedals and units out there too.

Before I go into the technical details, I’ll first examine the “why”… as in, “Why did Mark bother to brainstorm, purchase, assemble and carry around this giant tangle of cables and rack-mounted insanity?”

Heh.

Good question. Actually, quite a while back, when my good friend Scott and I were starting to put together the band that would eventually become Second Story, we both decided that we needed the ultimate in flexibility for our sounds. While we always intended to have a keyboard player in the band, we also wanted Scott (on guitar) and me (on bass) to be able to create new sonic flavors to add to our musical stew. That is, besides the “normal” guitar and bass tones that are common in popular music. And we needed them to be switchable “on the fly” so that we could change them between songs – even mid-song – so that we could really be free to create new textures. So we set out to figure out how to do that.

So now that you understand the why (maybe) here’s the gear list.

The image to the right shows the rig behind me; it is an earlier shot, prior to the addition of the MB76 Patch Mixer.

    Rack 1

  • Furman Power Conditioner
  • dbx Subharmonic Synthesizer
  • ADA MB-1 Preamp
  • Peavey Spectrum Analog Filter
  • Akai MB76 Patch Mixer
  • Yamaha G50 Pitch-to-Midi Translator
  • Alesis NanoBass Synth Module
  • Furman Pluglock
  • Rack 2

  • ADA B500B Power Amplifier
  • Speaker Cabinets

  • SWR Goliath Jr. 2×10″
  • SWR Big Ben 1×18″ Subwoofer
  • Miscellaneous

  • Digital Music Corp. Ground Control MIDI Pedal
  • Ernie Ball Volume Pedal (used as CV pedal for MIDI)
  • Axon AIX-103 Hexaphonic MIDI Bass Pickup

So you can see that there are a lot of components; all of the ones in the “Rack 1” list are crammed into a 6-space SKB rack. That rack also has one of my favorite gigging inventions, the “RakTrap.” It is an addition to the SKB which adds two separate door-access compartments into the back lid – normally wasted space – where I can carry spare cables, a flashlight, a soldering iron, picks (for when Scott would invariably forget his), my eBow, spare strings, NuSkin liquid bandage in case of emergency, and much more. It’s a shame that they aren’t available anymore…

Next Issue: The ADA Preamplifier, and why it’s so freaking awesome…

Share : facebooktwittergoogle plus
pinterest

1 2 3 4 5 6 12